Many fighters fight certain fighters better than they do others, regardless if those others are top or lower fighters. Sarah is easily STILL a much bigger threat to Rhondana than Tate. C. McGreggor fought two nobodies yet he gets a title fight against Aldo, likely here in the USA (a load of dino droppings!!!) when it should be in Brazil. Dana has made many fights happen when they should not have, and in that, Sarah should have gotten a rematch with Rhondana a while a go, but because everyone KNOWS Sarah IS a huge threat to them, Dana didn't schedule such a rematch. Now, if Cat beats Rhondana, Rhondana will NOT fight Bethe Correia (the other big threat to Rhondana) but a much weaker...again...M. Tate--just so that Rhonda wins and fights for the title again. If Rhondana wins, Dana WILL fix it so that Rhonda doesn't rematch Sarah, nor fights Bethe anytime soon. Depending on how the fight goes with Cat, if Cat fights very well but looses, Dana will make Rhonda not fight neither Sarah, Cat, nor Bethe. If they do fight, and if the fight is somewhat close, Dana will payoff the refs and judges to have Rhonda[na] win, much like the MUCH early call when Sarah first fought Rhondana.
What a load of crap. I notice Rousey v Correia is about to take place in Brazil.....And your comment seems to indicate that Sara (not Sarah) McMann should get a title fight after a loss??
I don't understand how you could score that 29-27 - I can only think they scored the first red 10-9 to mcmann and the 2nd. Round 10-9 to meisha and the third 10-8 to Meisha - but I would have said rnd 1 was more dominant than rnd 3.